Connect with us


Spending on cybersecurity grows, but so do errors in its implementation according to Fastly Inc

Avatar of Thomas Grimm



fastly ecommerce datacenter jpg

There is no doubt that every organizational environment has innumerable challenges to face and cybersecurity, of course, is one of the highest priorities. The advancement of technology is unstoppable. Thanks to this, companies can become better managed, more competitive and have a broader vision of the future. However, the hidden dangers of the Internet and cybercrime are also becoming increasingly complex and sophisticated. Do companies invest adequately in cybersecurity? Not at all.

According to a recent study published by Fastly, what is the fastest edge cloud platform in the world, IT managers are investing incorrectly in cybersecurity. And all despite the fact that 73% of organizations have increased their spending on network protection. Figure that shoots up to 77% in the case of Spanish companies. But why? What happens so that this investment is not as prolific as it should be?

So only 6 out of 10 cybersecurity tools are fully active, or what is the same: companies do not fully take advantage of them, allowing loopholes that can be exploited by cybercriminals. A figure that is 67% in the US and 64% in the case of public administrations. But watch out! The problems do not end here, since even 42% of these tools overlap, causing errors in the implementation of cybersecurity in companies with all the guarantees they need. This can lead, for example, to false positives.

“Businesses are well aware of the serious repercussions of a cybersecurity breach and are trying to increase their security budgets accordingly. However, this increase in spending is rarely driven by a key strategic objective. This means that companies often end up with solutions that are not fit for purpose and in many cases run these tools in log-only mode for a long period of time, offering absolutely no protection,” explains Sean Leach. , Chief Product Architect at Fastly.

The main threats of 2023

If 2022 has been a challenge in terms of security, 2023 presents itself as another clear challenge to face and where, as is to be expected, the historical shares in attacks and cybercrime.

Globally, IT managers are clear: 32% highlight breaches and data loss and 29% malware and 26% phishing as their top concerns. In Spain, these professionals put malware (34%), data breaches and loss (29%) and ransomware (22%) first.

Cybersecurity & teleworking

Although teleworking has decreased worldwide due to an improvement in the health situation due to Covid-19, it is here to stay in a large number of companies or, at least, in a hybrid way. A way of working that also entails its risks. In fact, 82% of IT managers surveyed express concern about the effect on your cybersecurity strategy of the adoption of teleworking since the pandemic.

In fact, up to 46% of these predict that cyberattacks on remote workers will drive cybersecurity threats in the next twelve months, and 38% have made protecting the new hybrid workforce their top priority for the coming year. In Spain these figures are somewhat lower since, Although the penetration of teleworking has increased in Spain after the lockdowns, it has now returned to a face-to-face situation of around 50/50, as Daniel Howe, Security Senior Presales, Fastly comments.

“If companies have a good understanding of cybersecurity fundamentals, such as non-SMS-based two-factor authentication, rigid authorization rules, rate limiting to control requests sent or received when necessary, and extensive training in security issues in all parts of the organization, then they will be in a position to defend against the most common threats, particularly potential data breaches. These basic measures go a long way to avoiding serious financial and data loss and should be a priority for all businesses, regardless of their size,” says Sean Leach.

Lack of employee experience

It goes without saying that, with greater awareness and preparation of employees in terms of cybersecurity, there will also be a more protected and secure company. However, there is a gap that is repeated in many organizations: the lack of experience in security Technologys among employeesas admitted by 43% of companies, 46% in the case of Spain.

In our country, this situation is especially important in smaller companies (less than 1,000 employees, with 55%) than in larger companies (5,000 to 10,000 employees, with 29%). And all this, despite the fact that 50% of the companies affirm that they are working on improve the cybersecurity skills of your employees through training or through talent acquisition being the figure of the CISO as a key agent already for 57% of the companies, 62% in the case of Spanish companies. Among his main challenges, maintaining a deep knowledge of all areas of IT and dealing with its legal and operational responsibility.

To address these and other cybersecurity bugs, Fastly helps improve site performance, increase security, and drive innovation on a global scale. In fact, its joint offering of edge computing, content delivery, and security has been recognized as a leader by industry analysts such as IDC, Forrester, and Gartner. Fastly’s network architecture enables developers to deliver secure websites and applications on a global scale with fast time to market and industry leading cost savings.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


OpenAI announces ChatGPT Plus, a paid version of its AI chatbot, for $20 per month

Avatar of Thomas Grimm



openai chatgpt plus 20 dolares

Just a few days ago OpenAI announced that it was preparing a paid version of ChatGPT. And it’s ready: ChatGPT Plus. with her, for 20 dollars a monthits users will have priority access to this chatbot, even during peak hours of use of this Artificial Intelligence text generation system.

Users who do not pay to access ChatGPT Plus will therefore have to wait for paid users to let it go. The plan also promises to offer faster response times, as well as priority access to new features and improvements that OpenAI releases for the chatbot in the future.

For now, OpenAI will send messages to start subscriptions to ChatGPT Plus to users who are in the United States and are signed up to the waiting list of those who want to subscribe to the ChatGPT payment plan in the coming weeks. For now there are no deadlines or dates for the expansion of the service to other countries, and OpenAI has limited itself to saying in this regard that it will open the plan to other countries and regions in the future.

Just a few days ago there was speculation about the price that the monthly subscription to ChatGPT Plus would have. According to various rumors it was going to be much higher, and that it was going to cost up to 42 dollars a month, which would make it difficult for small companies and research groups and organizations to access it. At $20 a month, it will be accessible to more people and entities that need reliable access to texts generated by Artificial Intelligence.

Furthermore, this price, and its features, could set the stage for a standard in the capabilities and cost of other Artificial Intelligence chatbots appearing on the market. Of course, from OpenAI they have been quick to make it clear that ChatGPT is not going to become a tool without free options. Its managers have ensured that there will continue to be free access to the chatbot, thanks to the fact that paying users will contribute to it with their monthly payments. For now, they continue to advance in their development, for which they are going to hire new specialized personnel.

Continue Reading


OpenAI invests in ChatGPT coding and programming with new hires

Avatar of Thomas Grimm



OpenAI invierte en la codificacion y programacion de ChatGPT con la contratacion de nuevos profesionales

Despite the massive layoffs taking place in the technology sector, Open AI commitment to the recruitment of personnel for the creation of new artificial intelligence models that allow them to improve their products, among them, ChatGPT. The objective of the company co-founded by Elon Musk would be incorporate 1,000 new workers in different countries around the world to work on creating improved code in their AI tools.

Of those thousand new employees, about 600 (40%) are programmers whose work will focus on AI performing software engineering tasks. The remaining 60% will focus on the ‘data labeling’, that is, in the creation of raw data (text, audio, images and videos) that will then be labeled to specify the context in which the AI ​​is developed. The profile currently most in demand by OpenAI would be that of python developera highly qualified programming language.

This study, included in a Semafor report, shows that new hires will have to create training data that will encompass from lines of code to explanations of it in natural language. OpenAI has a tool with these characteristics launched in 2021, OpenAI Codexwhich received training on data pulled from GitHub (Microsoft’s code repository). Similarly, Codex is used by Microsoft to power GitHub Copilot, a service that will help programmers write code.

Open AI Codex masters more than a dozen programming languages and is capable of interpreting simple commands in natural language and creating an interface for existing applications. Regardless, coding could improve ChatGPT’s ability to converse with humans and thus overcome barriers such as those of the Stack Overflow website, which accuses the OpenAI AI tool of not offering reliable answers.

The key to being able to establish improvements in a coding assistant will be to build a system capable of anticipating the effect of its own actions and set up an internal system. Meta’s chief artificial intelligence scientist, Yann LeCunclaimed that there was a great similarity between cruise control systems in cars and coding assistants like Copilot. And it is that if the human does not establish a constant supervision on Copilot, it will end up making almost negligible code errors. The problem resides when we are dealing with a code model that is sometimes executed and sometimes not.

The OpenAI Selection Process

For the election of qualified personnel regarding the programming and control of ChatGPT, OpenAI subjected the candidates to a five hour unpaid coding test having to undertake different tasks. One of them was to explain in writing how they would solve a coding problem and, in the event of detecting errors in the process, explain what they were and how they should be corrected. In the end, the objective is to feed the tool with very specific training data that the human himself marks for it.

The objective of Elon Musk’s company is that these workers can make AI capable of write code for a more precise method, replacing entry-level programmers in the future. Only then will it be possible to strengthen the power of its AI tools, such as ChatGPT, adapting more quickly and intelligently to changes and being able to face the main competing companies in the sector.

Continue Reading


from February 9 you have to pay to use it

Avatar of Thomas Grimm



twitter acaba gratis api

Twitter continue with him trickle of measures aimed at raising their incomeeven if they are deeply unpopular. This is the case of the last one that he has announced: the end of free use of your API. As of February 9, all the services and tools that currently use this API free of charge and that want or need to continue using it will have to pay for it, or simply stop providing the service they provide thanks to it. This was communicated by the company through a thread published on the Twitter Developer account:

From within just a week, therefore, the company will block non-paying developers from accessing version 1.1 of its APIalready considered legacy, and the current one, the V2. For now there is no more information about the amount that the network will charge for using its APIs. It is only known that there will be a basic payment plan, but it is unknown what type of access it will offer. All when there is barely a week left for the change to take place.

This step follows the abrupt changes in the terms of use of said API in recent weeks, after the company suspended access to such popular and relevant apps in its history as Tweetbot and Twitterrific. As a result, many third-party Twitter apps have stopped working and have removed their mobile apps from the iOS and Android app stores. In some cases, as has happened with the creators of Tweetbot, the companies that developed those apps have changed their focus to launch apps for Mastodon and other networks, or are considering doing so in the future.

Meanwhile, confusion and uncertainty is growing among developers using the Twitter API in numerous projects. Also among its users. At present there are thousands of developers who use the Twitter API for, for example, the development of informative bots that publish information in other networks, and in systems related to weather information and other types of data.

In many cases, the free Twitter API has served for the development of projects created as a hobby, which will probably end up not working. It is more than likely that the same will happen with bots that automatically post tweets on other networks, such as the aforementioned Mastodon.

On the other hand, the academic sector, and that dedicated to research, will be greatly affected by this measure. For now, Twitter has not specified whether the announcement to end the free use of its API, on which hundreds of thousands of projects in both sectors depend, also affects researchers and education.

Among the ongoing investigations there are many in sectors such as the study of hate speech and online abuse. In addition, universities often use Twitter to study human behavior in different parts of the world based on what its inhabitants say and share on social networks. Not having free access to the Twitter API will also raise many complications for companies and organizations working to detect the spread of fake news and misinformation.

Twitter’s relationship with developers building products off of its API has always been a complicated one. But for better or worse, that relationship worked, and there have been numerous services and tools that have been born from the Twitter API since its arrival.

Despite several initial rebuffs, on the other hand, Twitter had been working for years to improve the relationship with developers by launching various programs and actions, which has meant that the developer ecosystem around its API was still alive.

This has all been blown up ever since Musk bought the company, and API pay-as-you-go may be the last nail in the community’s coffin. Meanwhile, Twitter continues to increase control over how Twitter users access the network and trying to increase their revenue. And developers will probably change the social network with which to work and create their tools.

Continue Reading